Speech before Jum’aa Khutbah beneficial or harmful?‏

In the name of Allah, most merciful, most kind.
Speech before Jum’aa Khutbah beneficial or harmful?

There is a format of Jum’aa that has been followed for a very long time, and it is continued in USA for some Masajids. In this format, there is no adhan before khateeb (Imam) stands for a non-arabic khutbah (sermon), then there is a beautiful and emotional speech is delivered in english or urdu or other local tongues. Then, khateeb sits down, and adhan is called. Then, sunnah salat is performed. Then, there is another adhan. Then, khateeb stands up and delivers an arabic khutbah with a short pause in between, but the khutbah is the same every week. Then, Iqamah is called.

If one is from India or Pakistan, this is a very familiar format of Jum’aa.

Before we take this format apart and examine it, let’s look at from practical perspective.

Allah has asked Muslims to drop their business, and rush towards Masjid for Jum’aa. Our Prophet (PBUH) taught us that we have to enter Masjid before Imam has stood up, if we want the reward of Jum’aa, because angels close their book. Prophet’s khutbah’s are considered to be the best source of learning for Muslims. I would also add that emphasis on khutbah seems to be to refresh E’maan of Muslims on a weekly basis, at least.

If we pay close attention, or if we have been to Jum’aa regularly to the Masjid where this format is followed, it will be very visible that most people will try their best to reach the Masjid right before the arabic khutbah is about to start. Now, they will hear the Arabic khutbah, which will not make any sense to them because they don’t speak Arabic. Let’s suppose they do understand Arabic, same khutba every week doesn’t help. What would they have learned from that week’s Jum’aa? Probably nothing.

'Abdullah ibn 'Umar reports that the Peophet forbade buying and selling in the
mosque, reciting poetry in it, or announcing lost items, and he especially
prohibited making a circle [i.e., a meeting in a circle] before the Friday
prayer. This is related by the five, and at-Tirmizhi calls it sahih.

If the English talk is not part of khutbah, it is in violation to direct order from Prophet from the hadith above. If it is part of the khutbah, it is a bid’aa, since there is no evidence that Prophet made such talks or gave same Arabic khutbah every week making it an invention in ibadah. Either way it doesn’t fit the Shri’aa or Hanafi teachings.

Why would we not start with some praises to Allah in Arabic, then deliver a Khutbah in local language, then a short pause, then read a Quranic ayat in Arabic, and/or Hadith, then deliver second part of Khutbah? Interestingly, this will be the format closest to Sunnah of Rasool (PBUH), and will satisfy all requirements of Jum’aa.

It seems that it began by someone with a good intention of teaching the people before the Arabic Khutbah starts, which he was forced to say in Arabic.

Issue is that it creates a situation where people either have to sit through a very long Jum’aa which may discourage them from coming, or coming after the English talk, since “Angels are still writing” ( so has decided by some scholars who support this format), and miss any opportunity to learn about Islam.

I urge the Imams to reconsider this format, since it is harming more than benefiting, and the people coming late at their English talk is due to this format. If the english talk is integrated into Arabic khutbah, people will be urged to come, and it will not violate Prophet’s order to not gather before Jum’aa.

Following is the best argument on this topic, and I would like to share in the author’s words. Please read through it.

Recently, I was approached by a “Alim” who attended a Friday Khutbah I delivered. He wanted five minutes of my time to discuss my speech. He started talking about the importance of having the Khutbah in Arabic. Now, I knew where this was going. See, this is not the first time I have been approached by someone who wanted to convince me that the Khutbah is meant to be in Arabic. Usually, I thank the brother for the advice and I don’t enter into what I think is a vain argument. However, this time seemed to be different. The man was very humble in his approach and flexible in his argument. What you’re about to see is somewhat of a reenactment of our conversation, though not verbatim. Some of us may have seen some scholarly debates over certain Fiqhi issues. Sometimes it’s hard to keep up with the arguments and counter-arguments when they are narrated by a third person. So I thought I’d use an innovative approach of presenting this argument in a conversation style. In order to make it less personal however, I’m representing both sides of the conversations as Opinion1 (representing him) and Opinion2 (representing me). Here we go:

Opinion1: What do you think about having the Khutbah in Arabic?

Opinion2: I don’t think it’s feasible in the conditions we’re in.

Opinion1: But there is an agreement among schools that it should be in Arabic.

Opinion2: I’m not aware of that. What I have seen in this country is that some followers of the Hanafi School apply this ruling.

Opinion1: In fact, the Hanafis are the most lenient when it comes to this issue. The Malikis are the most strict. That is, if you can’t find someone to do the Khutbah in Arabic, then the Friday prayer is not even obligatory!

Opinion2: I’ll check on that. But what I know is that there is a difference of opinion on this matter. The reason for the difference is due to how the Khutbah is viewed. Is it viewed as analogous to prayer or is it viewed as an admonition?

Opinion1: I think it’s more like a prayer. This is because of a statement by Omar ibn al-Khattab, which explains that the other two rakah of Dhuhr were replaced by the Khutbah. [Later I checked this Athar by Omar and discovered that Sheikh M. N. D. al-Albani had weakened this Athar. See al-Irwaa, hadith #605].

Opinon2: Agreed but we can’t consider the Khutbah to be exactly like prayer. Scholars mention that the Imam can drink water during Khutbah, can give Khutbah without Wudu, can speak of unrelated subjects during the Khutbah, at least briefly; all of which is not allowed during prayer.

Opinion1: Can you please look into this matter and see what the Imams have said about this issue?

Opinion2: Of course I will. But let us also keep in mind the purpose of the Khutbah. The goal of the Khutbah is to remind and educate the people. We also have to understand the context of the statements by the Imams or their schools. They lived at a time where Arabic was the language of the day (just like English is today), where Islam was the superpower. This is totally different from today where even Arabic speaking Muslims cannot guarantee that their children will speak Arabic, and where learning the language is not readily accessible to many.

Later, I looked at the opinions of the four schools and here is what I found (courtesy of al-Fiqh alaa al-Madhaahib al-Arba’ah by al-Jazeeree):



Hanafi:

It’s permissible for the Khutbah to not be in Arabic, even if the Khateeb is capable of speaking Arabic, and whether the audience speaks Arabic or not.

Maliki:

It’s a condition for the Khutbah to be in Arabic, even if the audience does not understand Arabic. If they don’t have a Khateeb that is good in Arabic, then Friday prayer is not obligatory on them!!!

Shafi’i:

The pillars of the Khutbah (e.g. recitation of an Ayah or a Hadith) has to be in Arabic. Non-Arabic is not sufficient if the Imam is able to learn Arabic. If not, then he can use a different language. That is if the audience is Arabic-speaking. If not, then even the pillars of Khutbah don’t have to be in Arabic. Anything other than the pillars of the Khutbah can be delivered in any language but Arabic is recommended.

Hanbali:

The Khutbah is not acceptable in a language other than Arabic, if the Imam is able to speak it. If not, then he can use any language he masters. This is whether the audience is Arabic-speaking or not. However, the [recitation of an] Ayah that is a pillar of the Khutbah must be uttered in Arabic. If he cannot, then he utters any dhikr in Arabic. If he’s not able to even do that, then he stays silent for the duration of reciting such an Ayah!!

In order to get around all this, some Masjids in the U.S. have implemented what I call a workaround. They added a so-called “talk” in English before the Adhan to fulfill the admonition goal of the Khutbah. After the Adhan, they have the actual Khutbah in Arabic. Although this seems to solve all problems mentioned above, it does introduce another set of problems. This supposed workaround may go against a prohibition from the Prophet (sal Allahu alayhi wa sallam) not to conduct any halaqa or lecture before the Friday Khutbah.

عن عبد الله بن عمرو بن العاص أن النبي صلّى الله عليه وسلّم نهى عن التحلّق قبل الصلاة يوم الجمعة

صحيح أبي داود 991، صحيح الجامع 6885

From Abdullah bin Amr bin al-Aas that the Prophet (sal Allahu alayhi wa sallam) forbade making circles [for knowledge or remembrance] before prayer on Friday. (Saheeh Abu Dawud #991, Saheeh al-Jami’ #6885)

Imam ibn al-Jawzi (d. 597) briefly commented on this hadith in his celebrated work “Talbees Iblees”

He [the Prophet] disliked that people gather before the Friday prayer for the purpose of seeking knowledge and studying. Rather, he ordered us to busy ourselves with voluntary prayer and to listen to the Khutbah (The Chapter of the Play of Iblis with the People of Hadith)

In other words, the time before the Khutbah should be utilized in preparation for the Khutbah, not in something that will take the glory away from the Khutbah. In fact, there are authentic hadith that tell us to spend this important time in voluntary prayer. This is the one action that will make us ready to absorb the most from the Khutbah. The proposed pre-Khutbah “talk” on the other hand will deprive the actual Khutbah from its meaning, exhaust the attention of the worshippers, and disturb the whole structure of the Friday prayer.

By the way, the “Alim” above had for me another proposal that I had not heard before. He said, you can have the first Khutbah in Arabic and the second in English. But, I said this still doesn’t meet the requirements of the Imams/Schools who say that both Khutbah should be in Arabic. Moreover, what do you think will happen to the people who don’t speak Arabic who have to withstand for about 15 to 20 minutes a speech they don’t understand? Their minds will wander and their hearts will not benefit.

Finally, I don’t claim to have the final words on this issue. However, I don’t even see the famous followers of the schools (e.g. Hamza Yusuf, a follower of the strictist school on this subject, the Maliki School) deliver Arabic Khutbah in this country at this time. What I do know is that this is one issue where we have to look more at the Maqasid [goals] of Shariah and less at the words of a scholar or the opinion of a school, which may have been formulated for a different time or context. After all, this is not a case where one is violating a clear ruling of the Quran or the Sunnah!! Allah knows best!


May Allah give us strength to follow Islam completely,

Adnan Jumani

A Muslim and nothing more.